makerolz.blogg.se

Numerous companies and industry groups have promulgated self-regulatory codes or guidelines for the use of personal information.

This article is part of a broader study by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) about the uses and limitations of self-regulation. The NTIA has also already given (somewhat qualified) support for a self-regulatory approach for the control of personal information in telecommunications. Today we face a special urgency in deciding how to use markets, self-regulation, and government enforcement to protect personal information.

#7 free secrets to stealth attraction techniques summarized how to# There is a widespread and accurate sense that a greater amount of personal information is being assembled in databases, and that more and more people have the computer and telecommunications resources to access and manipulate that personal information. The economics and technologies underlying use of personal information are fundamentally changing. These changes, in turn, make it quite likely that we will need to change the institutional arrangements governing use of personal information. The protection of personal information arises in a wide and growing range of industries. A partial listing might include: health records credit history banking transactions local and long-distance telephone calls pay-per-view, VCR rental, cable, and other video records records of an Internet service provider and purchases made through direct mail or telephone ordering. This paper cannot hope to determine the best mix of markets, self-regulation, and government for protecting privacy in all of these diverse industries.

This paper instead provides an analytic framework for understanding privacy issues in a wide range of industries. #7 free secrets to stealth attraction techniques summarized how to#Īrmed with the analytic framework, we will not only understand more clearly what is meant by "self-regulation," but we will identify the empirical issues that are likely to be crucial in deciding when self-regulation should be preferred over market or government approaches.